This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
automation:automation [2021/01/01 21:25] 127.0.0.1 external edit |
— (current) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== Automation tools ====== | ||
- | |||
- | You can go through the below table to get an overview of the metrics on which I will be comparing these tools. | ||
- | |||
- | ^Metrics ^Chef ^Puppet ^Ansible ^Saltstack^ | ||
- | |Availability| ✔| ✔| ✔| ✔| | ||
- | |Ease of Setup| Not very easy| Not very easy| Easy| Not very easy| | ||
- | |Management| Not very easy| Not very easy| Easy| Easy| | ||
- | |Scalability| Highly Scalable| Highly Scalable| Highly Scalable| Highly Scalable| | ||
- | |Configuration language |DSL(Ruby)| DSL(PuppetDSL)| YAML(Python)| YAML(Python)| | ||
- | |Interoperability |High| High| High| High| | ||
- | |Pricing (upto 100 nodes)| $13700| $11200-$19900| $10,000| $15,000(approx.)| | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | These are many more factors on which you can compare these tools. Let’s dig deeper into each tool and understand the difference between Chef vs Puppet vs Ansible vs Saltstack. | ||
- | |||
- | ^ Product Capabilities ^^^ | ||
- | ^ Chef ^ Puppet ^ Ansible ^ | ||
- | |Continuous delivery with automated workflow|Orchestration|Simple orchestration| | ||
- | |Compliance and security management|Automated provisioning|Streamlined provisioning| | ||
- | |Infrastructure automation|Code and node management|Continuous delivery with automated workflow| | ||
- | | |Configuration automation|App deployment| | ||
- | | |Simple visualization and reporting|Security and compliance integration into automated processes| | ||
- | | |High transparency| | | ||
- | | |Role-based access control| | | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | https://www.edureka.co/blog/chef-vs-puppet-vs-ansible-vs-saltstack/ | ||
- | |||
- | https://www.veritis.com/blog/chef-vs-puppet-vs-ansible-comparison-of-devops-management-tools/ | ||